• Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Rss this site
  • Log In
    • Register
Contacts us @ MediPr.org
Medical News Asia | Powered by ['mediPr]
  • MDnews
  • About [‘mediPr]
  • HER2 Explorer
  • TROP Tool
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Scroll to next section Scroll to next section

Non-Sponsored Content

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail


IMMUNOONCOLOGY

Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

By: scienterrific | Last updated: 25 September 2018 | In: WCLC 2018, Lung Cancer, Oncology, Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy

Article Keywords

pemetrexed, Genentech, Tecentriq, non-squamous cell lung cancer, PD-L1, platinum-doublet, NSCLC, Roche, atezolizumab, cisplatin, carboplatin

An interim analysis of the Phase III IMpower132 study with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor atezolizumab (Tecentriq®, Roche/Genentech) showed that addition of atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) plus pemetrexed improves the median progression-free survival (PFS) in treatment-naïve patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The median PFS for atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and a platinum salt was 7.6 months vs 5.2 months with chemotherapy alone (HR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.49-0.72; p<0.0001).

The data were presented at the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2018 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) on Monday 24 September (Abstract OA05.07 Oral).

The open-label, Phase III IMpower132 randomised 578 treatment-naïve patients with non-squamous NSCLC 1:1 to receive four or six cycles of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) with pemetrexed vs platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed alone. Patients who showed clinical benefit during the initial four to six cycles of chemotherapy received maintenance therapy until disease progression. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS (RECIST v1.1) and overall survival (OS).

Although the co-primary PFS endpoint was met, the co-primary OS endpoint had not yet been reached. The OS showed a numerical improvement of 4.5, the median OS in the experimental arm was 18.1 months vs 13.6 months in the control arm (HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.64-1.03; p=0.0797). The final OS results are expected next year.

Table 1 shows the results of the interim analysis in the general study population, and Table 2 shows the PFS results of the study by PD-L1 expression.

Table 1. Efficacy result in the overall IMpower132 study population. CARBO, carboplatin; CI, confidence interval; CIS, cisplatin; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, objective response rate; PEM, pemetrexed, PFS, progression-free survival
atezolizumab + PEM & CARBO/CIS (n=292)PEM & CARBO/CIS (n=286)
PFS, mo (95% CI)7.6 (6.6, 8.5)5.2 (4.3, 5.6)(HR=0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72; p<0.0001)
12-mo PFS, %33.717.0
ORR, %4732
Median DOR, mo10.17.2
Ongoing response, %4230
Interim OS, mo (95% CI)18.1 (13.0, NE)13.6 (11.4, 15.5)(HR=0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.03; p=0.0797)
12-mo OS, %59.655.4
Table 2. PFS results of the IMpower132 study by PD-L1 expression. CARBO, carboplatin; CI, confidence interval; CIS, cisplatin; HR, hazard ratio; IC, immune cell; PEM, pemetrexed; PFS, progression-free survival; TC, tumour cell
atezolizumab + PEM & CARBO/CISPEM & CARBO/CIS
12-mo PFS, %
(TC3/IC3 [n=45])
46%25%
Median PFS, mo
(TC3/IC3 [n=45])
10.86.5(HR=0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96)
12-mo PFS, %
(TC1/2 or IC1/2 [n=136])
27%20%
Median PFS, mo
(TC1/2 or IC1/2 [n=136])
6.25.7(HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16)
12-mo PFS, %
(TC0/IC0 [n=163])
35%8%
Median PFS, mo
(TC0/IC0 [n=163])
8.54.9(HR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.31, 0.64)

The investigators did not report new safety signals with the combination, the safety for atezolizumab plus chemotherapy appeared consistent with the documented safety profiles of the individual drugs. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 53.6% of patients receiving atezolizumab plus chemotherapy vs 39.1% of people receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed alone.

Reference

Papadimitrakopoulou VA, et al. Presented at the IASLC 2018 WCLC; 2018 Sept 24; Toronto, Ont, Canada. Abstract #OA05.07


Newsletter Sign-Up

Do you like our content? Subscribe to our non-intrusive newsletter today! We promise we won’t be spammy.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Disclaimer

This article is not medical advice. Patients should seek personal assessment by a licenced specialist. Physicians are recommended to read the full publication(s) as cited in the article before making medical decisions. This article does not supersede nor replace the published article(s).

© Copyright 2018 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. – Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS in NSCLC

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2018 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. – Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS in NSCLC

Categories

Categories

Newsletter


 [‘mediPr] | MediPaper Healthcare Writers | Digital Medical Marketing | Medical Writing Solutions 醫學寫作 | Medical Writing Quote | Medical Writing Portfolio | Medical Writer Hong Kong 醫學作家香港 | Hire Healthcare Writers Hong Kong | Contact our Medical Writer Agency | MediPaper Health News | CORTiX AI for Medical Science | Dub-Dub Subtitle Generation
© 2016-2026 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. | Website by [’mediPr] Sydney | Singapore | Hong Kong | 醫學作家香港 | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Rss this site
Link to: First-line osimertinib vs EGFR-TKI in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC Link to: First-line osimertinib vs EGFR-TKI in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC First-line osimertinib vs EGFR-TKI in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC Link to: Duvelisib FDA approved for adult patients with R/R follicular lymphoma Link to: Duvelisib FDA approved for adult patients with R/R follicular lymphoma Duvelisib FDA approved for adult patients with R/R follicular lymphoma
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKPrivacy Settings×

Cookies and Privacy on medi-paper.com



Cookie Policy

How MediPaper uses cookies is explained in our Cookie Policy

Privacy Policy

Read MediPaper's Privacy Policy

Google Analytics cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

5
Accept settingsHide notification only