• Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Rss this site
  • Log In
    • Register
Contacts us @ MediPr.org
Medical News Asia | Powered by ['mediPr]
  • MDnews
  • About [‘mediPr]
  • HER2 Explorer
  • TROP Tool
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Scroll to next section Scroll to next section

Non-Sponsored Content

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail


By: Stijn van den Borne, MSc | Last updated: 24 September 2018 | In: Lung Cancer, Oncology, Targeted Therapies

Article Keywords

Iressa, AstraZeneca, Tarceva, erlotinib, gefitinib, Genentech, AZ, EGFR, exon 19 deletion, exon 21 L858R mutation, osimertinib, NSCLC, Tagrisso, Roche

First-line osimertinib was associated with a clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement when compared to a standard-of-care (SOC) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in a sub-analysis of Asian patients who participated in the FLAURA trial (NCT02296125).

The Phase III FLAURA trial recruited 322 Asian patients at Asian sites with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confirmed exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR-TKI sensitising mutations (EGFRm). Participants were randomised 1:1 to either receive osimertinib at 80 mg once daily (QD) orally (PO) or another SOC EGFR-TKI (erlotinib 150 mg QD PO, or gefitinib 250 mg QD PO). The primary efficacy endpoint was the investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included the overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy, and safety.

The median PFS was 16.5 months in the osimertinib patients vs 11.0 months in patients treated with SOC EGFR-TKI (HR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.41–0.72; p<0.0001). The ORR was 80% vs 75% for osimertinib vs SOC EGFR-TKI, respectively. The median CNS PFS was not yet evaluable for the osimertinib group and measured 13.8 months for the SOC EGFR-TKI group (HR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.25–1.17; p=0.118). The OS data were not yet mature.

The safety profile in this Asian subset was consistent with the safety in the overall FLAURA study population. Osimeritinib was associated with fewer Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs): 40% vs 48% with SOC EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred less frequent with osimertinib when compared to SOC EGFR-TKI: 15% vs 21%, respectively.

Reference:

Cho BC, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.004.


Newsletter Sign-Up

Do you like our content? Subscribe to our non-intrusive newsletter today! We promise we won’t be spammy.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Disclaimer

This article is not medical advice. Patients should seek personal assessment by a licenced specialist. Physicians are recommended to read the full publication(s) as cited in the article before making medical decisions. This article does not supersede nor replace the published article(s).

© Copyright 2018 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. – First-line osimertinib vs EGFR-TKI in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2018 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. – First-line osimertinib vs EGFR-TKI in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC

Categories

Categories

Newsletter


 [‘mediPr] | MediPaper Healthcare Writers | Digital Medical Marketing | Medical Writing Solutions 醫學寫作 | Medical Writing Quote | Medical Writing Portfolio | Medical Writer Hong Kong 醫學作家香港 | Hire Healthcare Writers Hong Kong | Contact our Medical Writer Agency | MediPaper Health News | CORTiX AI for Medical Science | Dub-Dub Subtitle Generation
© 2016-2026 MediPaper Medical Communications Ltd. | Website by [’mediPr] Sydney | Singapore | Hong Kong | 醫學作家香港 | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Rss this site
Link to: Early breast cancer treatment in China remains conservative Link to: Early breast cancer treatment in China remains conservative Early breast cancer treatment in China remains conservative Link to: Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS in NSCLC Link to: Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS in NSCLC Frontline atezolizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS in NSCLC
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKPrivacy Settings×

Cookies and Privacy on medi-paper.com



Cookie Policy

How MediPaper uses cookies is explained in our Cookie Policy

Privacy Policy

Read MediPaper's Privacy Policy

Google Analytics cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

5
Accept settingsHide notification only